webmail | enquiries |
Useful Links Job Opportunities Contact Us

Concluded cases

  • UG Vs Ssewante Mathias (HCT-00-AC-SC- 29/23)

    Updated: Oct. 13, 2025, 3:15 p.m.

    Abuse of office and Corruption Ssewante pleaded guilty and was sentenced to three months imprisonment and ordered to refund UGX 15,000,000 which he picked from the complainant to enable her secure pension from Government. 5/09/2023

    Read More

  • Mutenyo Godfrey Vs UG (HCT-00-AC-CN-0004-2023)

    Updated: Oct. 13, 2025, 3:14 p.m.

    Solicitation and Receipt of gratification, Abuse of Office Conviction sustained on Appeal (11/07/2023)

    Read More

  • UG Vs Mohammed Wamwida and Gonasa Kalifani Towett (HCT-00-AC-CO- 18/2022)

    Updated: Oct. 13, 2025, 3:14 p.m.

    A1, Mohammed Wamwida Gonasa alias Paddy Musiime retired teacher from Kamonkoli Budaka district. A2, Kalifani Towett, Secretary for Works, Kapchorwa District Local Government. Personating of a Public Officer, Corruption and Aiding and Abetting Corruption A1 was convicted and sentenced as follows: Count 1 – fine of UGX 1,440,000= or 1-year imprisonment Count 2 – Fine of UGX 4,000,000= or 2 years’ imprisonment Count 3 – 4,800,000= or 2 years imprisonment. The sentence of imprisonment is to run concurrently

    Read More

  • UG Vs Omara Godfrey D’Bekas (HCT-00-AC-CO-104-2022)

    Updated: Oct. 13, 2025, 3:11 p.m.

    False Accounting by a Public Officer and Abuse of Office Conviction This matter was concluded on 8/06/2023 through plea bargain The accused person pleaded guilty to the charge of False Accounting by a Public Officer C/S 22 ACA ,2009 and was sentenced to a fine of UGX 1,300,000 (One million three hundred thousand) and in default to three years imprisonment. He further pleaded guilty to the charge of Abuse of Office C/S 11 ACA, 2009 and was sentenced to a fine of UGX 1,700,000 (One million seven hundred thousand) and in default to three years’ imprisonment. He undertook to refund the UGX 9,250,000 in issue in three equal instalments He was further ordered not to hold a public office for a period of 10 years from the date of conviction as provided under S.46 ACA.

    Read More

  • Safina Nanono Vs UG (COA-CR-Ap 0045/2019)

    Updated: Oct. 13, 2025, 3:10 p.m.

    Causing Financial Loss Appeal Dismissed Conviction upheld She is supposed to refund UGX 100,000,000

    Read More

  • UG Vs Anyakun Nato and Alfred Ngonemoe (MRT/CO/71/2022)

    Updated: Oct. 13, 2025, 3:09 p.m.

    Uttering forged documents Anyakun Nato and Alfred Ngonemoe, forestry officer and information technical officer of Nabilatuk respectively were charged with uttering forged documents to wit academic transcripts in order to secure jobs in public service. During the hearing, they changed their plea to that of guilt. They were convicted and sentenced to fines of UGX 500,000 or 1 year imprisonment in lieu

    Read More

  • Florence Nattu Vs UG (HCT-00-AC-CO- 18/2022)

    Updated: Oct. 13, 2025, 3:08 p.m.

    Causing Financial loss Appeal Dismissed Conviction upheld

    Read More

  • UG Vs Dannie Kasaza Turyashemererwa (HCT-00-AC-CO-0021-2021)

    Updated: Oct. 13, 2025, 3:07 p.m.

    Dannie Kasaza Turyashemererwa was convicted on charges of Embezzlement of UGX 8,200,000 meant for wiring materials for Ihunga Polytechnic Institute, Ntungamo district during FY 2015/2016 and sentenced to a fine of UGX 2,000,000 or imprisonment for two years in lieu. He was ordered to refund UGX 8,200,000.

    Read More

  • UG Vs Danson Tayebwa and Ramadhan Sseruyange (HCT-00-AC-CN -0077/2018)

    Updated: Oct. 13, 2025, 3:06 p.m.

    Convicted and sentenced as follows A1 Causing Financial Loss 3 years imprisonment Abuse of office 3 years imprisonment Forgery 3 years imprisonment He was further ordered to refund UGX 13,210,130 and not to hold a public office for 10 years from the date of conviction. A2 Causing Financial Loss 3 years imprisonment Abuse of office 3 years imprisonment He was further ordered to refund UGX 13,210,130 and not to hold a public office for 10 years from the date of conviction. NB: There was no option of fines and the sentences were scheduled to run concurrently.

    Read More

  • Baryamwesiga Robert Vs UG (COA-CR –CA-152 of 2022)

    Updated: Oct. 13, 2025, 3:04 p.m.

    The Appeal is was dismissed and the Appellants' conviction and Sentences were upheld. The Cross Appeal was allowed with the following orders The First Cross Respondent, Mr. Robert Baryamwesiga, is ordered to forfeit Ushs. 264,640,000/= to Government. The Second Cross Respondent, Mr. Fred Kiwanuka, is ordered to forfeit Ushs. 129,000,000/= to Government.

    Read More